Negative reinforcement increases the likelihood of a behavior because an aversive stimulus is removed. Which scenario best illustrates this principle?

Prepare for the LCSW Clinical Exam with our detailed review course. Engage in interactive quizzes and flashcards, complete with hints and detailed explanations. Ensure your success on exam day!

Multiple Choice

Negative reinforcement increases the likelihood of a behavior because an aversive stimulus is removed. Which scenario best illustrates this principle?

Explanation:
Negative reinforcement strengthens a behavior by removing an aversive stimulus. In this scenario, the buzzer is unpleasant. When the student answers correctly, the buzzer stops, removing the aversive stimulus. That relief reinforces the correct answering behavior, making it more likely to occur again to avoid the buzzer. By contrast, giving a sticker is positive reinforcement (adding a desirable stimulus to increase the behavior). A time-out is a negative punishment (removing access to reinforcement) to decrease misbehavior. Administering a punishment adds an aversive consequence to reduce behavior (positive punishment).

Negative reinforcement strengthens a behavior by removing an aversive stimulus. In this scenario, the buzzer is unpleasant. When the student answers correctly, the buzzer stops, removing the aversive stimulus. That relief reinforces the correct answering behavior, making it more likely to occur again to avoid the buzzer.

By contrast, giving a sticker is positive reinforcement (adding a desirable stimulus to increase the behavior). A time-out is a negative punishment (removing access to reinforcement) to decrease misbehavior. Administering a punishment adds an aversive consequence to reduce behavior (positive punishment).

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy